Planning to travel to Rwanda soon? Get ready to plan your trip and rent a…
Court rules Rwigara’s criticism of the government was an exercise of freedom of expression [Reuters]
Judges clear dissident politician Diane Rwigara on charges of inciting insurrection and document forgery.
A Rwandan court acquitted Diane Rwigara, a critic of veteran President Paul Kagame, on charges that included inciting insurrection and the forgery of documents.
Rwigara, 37, was arrested in September 2017 after her attempt to run in Rwanda’s presidential election was denied on grounds she allegedly forged the signatures of supporters for her bid.
She was also charged with inciting insurrection for comments criticising the government and Kagame in the run-up to the election. She faced 22 years in prison if convicted.
A panel of three judges ruled that the prosecution had failed to prove that Rwigara had personally forged signatures.
The court also said Rwigara’s criticism of the government in the press was an exercise of her freedom of expression, guaranteed by both the constitution and international law.
“All charges … have been dropped. The court finds that the prosecution’s charges were baseless,” said presiding judge Xavier Ndahayo.
Rwigara’s case has drawn global attention as Kagame again faces pressure to give more space to critics in the tightly controlled East African country.
“This is a testament that all these charges against me and my mother and family members are made up. I am extremely happy and I now have the energy and the zeal to continue my passion of fighting for freedom of expression and human rights in Rwanda,” Rwigara told AFP news agency.
‘Freedom of speech’
Charges were also dropped against Rwigara’s mother Adeline, 59, and four others with whom she had exchanged WhatsApp messages accusing the government of killing her husband, Assinapol Rwigara, who died in a car accident in 2015. The family has long said it was an assassination.
Assinapol was an influential industrialist who played an important role in financing the ruling Rwandan Patriotic Front (FPR) in the 1990s before later falling out with its leaders.
The court ruled Adeline was merely exercising her right to freedom of speech in a private manner. That’s why she had to be free.